Welcome to our online store!
You have no items in your basket.
Close
Filters
Search

Desire Lines: A Guide to Community Participation in Designing Places

Author/EditorMalone, Lesley (Author)
Publisher: RIBA Publishing
ISBN: 9781859467275
Pub Date01/09/2018
BindingPaperback
Pages192
Dimensions (mm)210(h) * 170(w)
This is a practical guide to running public consultations, co-design and community engagement to help practitioners make the most of local knowledge and insight for the benefit of design.
301,00 kr
241,00 kr
excluding shipping
Availability: 398 In Stock
+ -

Desire lines are the paths that people create through regular usage. They appear where people repeatedly choose to walk and usually signify a route from A to B that's quicker than the formal path provided. In most cases they indicate the mismatch between what local people want and what
designers think people want. By employing some social research basics in the
design development process, placemakers can work more meaningfully with local
communities to meet their needs and aspirations.

This is a practical guide to running public consultations,
co-design and community engagement to help practitioners make the most of local
knowledge and insight for the benefit of design. It offers guidance on managing
community participation, and unapologetically aims to encourage designers to
start thinking like social researchers when they undertake these programmes.

It's intended for placemakers - architects, urban designers,
landscape architects, and other built environment professionals involved in the
planning and design of public realm - who want to develop more people-centred,
community-led design approaches. It's also a valuable tool for students of
these disciplines, both as guidance on projects involving primary fieldwork,
and as general preparation for professional practice, where skills in working
with local communities are increasingly important.

Desire lines are the paths that people create through regular usage. They appear where people repeatedly choose to walk and usually signify a route from A to B that's quicker than the formal path provided. In most cases they indicate the mismatch between what local people want and what
designers think people want. By employing some social research basics in the
design development process, placemakers can work more meaningfully with local
communities to meet their needs and aspirations.

This is a practical guide to running public consultations,
co-design and community engagement to help practitioners make the most of local
knowledge and insight for the benefit of design. It offers guidance on managing
community participation, and unapologetically aims to encourage designers to
start thinking like social researchers when they undertake these programmes.

It's intended for placemakers - architects, urban designers,
landscape architects, and other built environment professionals involved in the
planning and design of public realm - who want to develop more people-centred,
community-led design approaches. It's also a valuable tool for students of
these disciplines, both as guidance on projects involving primary fieldwork,
and as general preparation for professional practice, where skills in working
with local communities are increasingly important.

Lesley Malone has a MSc in Social Research Methods, specialising in the study of public realm. With a career background in the built environment in a variety of research, information, and communications roles, she now works as a freelance writer specialising in research methods for people-centred public space.

1. Introduction 2. Research essentials for community participation 3. Observation 4. Diary studies A quick guide to qualitative data analysis 5. Exhibitions and public meetings A quick guide to public events 6. Survey methods 7. Focus groups A quick guide to communications 8. Collaborative approaches A quick guide to reporting research 9 . Ethical and inclusive practice 10. Participants' experiences

Write your own review
  • Only registered users can write reviews
*
*
Bad
Excellent
*
*
*
)
CLOSE